© 2024 New England Public Media

FCC public inspection files:
WGBYWFCRWNNZWNNUWNNZ-FMWNNI

For assistance accessing our public files, please contact hello@nepm.org or call 413-781-2801.
PBS, NPR and local perspective for western Mass.
Play Live Radio
Next Up:
0:00
0:00
0:00 0:00
Available On Air Stations

As Warren Steps Closer To Running, Would Her Anti-Corruption Campaign Get Her To The White House?

In this October 24, 2016, file photo, Sen. Elizabeth Warren, D-Mass. speaks at a rally for Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton at St. Anselm College in Manchester, N.H. (Andrew Harnik/AP)
In this October 24, 2016, file photo, Sen. Elizabeth Warren, D-Mass. speaks at a rally for Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton at St. Anselm College in Manchester, N.H. (Andrew Harnik/AP)

At a town hall meeting on Saturday in Holyoke, Sen. Elizabeth Warren moved a step closer to becoming a presidential candidate in 2020.

“After Nov. 6, I will take a hard look at running for president,” Warren announced to a room full of cheering supporters.

Warren has done a lot to fuel speculation that she’s preparing to run for president: She’s raising a lot of money and campaigns frequently across the country for fellow Democrats, raising her national profile.

And she’s pushing big national policy proposals, including anti-corruption legislation, which she introduced in August. That initiative is the focus of one of her political spots in which she casts herself as the would-be sheriff who wants to clean up Washington.

“The bill has six big ideas to take back our government from the wealthy and the powerful,” Warren says in the ad.

Among her proposals, Warren would impose lifetime lobbying bans on presidents, vice presidents, members of Congress, federal judges and Cabinet secretaries. The bill would also require presidential candidates to make their tax returns public, which is something President Trump has never done.

“Things are worse with Donald Trump in the White House. This is the most corrupt administration ever,” Warren told WBUR in a phone interview Friday.

But she said corruption in Washington predates Trump.

“The problem is in the structure — it’s how money influences this place, and how the wealthy and the well-connected get their way over and over, while everybody else gets left behind,” she said.

Warren has spent much of her career focused on corporate corruption. As a senator, and now as a possible presidential candidate, she’s taking on political corruption.

“It’s a wining issue for anybody who believes it,” says Bill Curry, a former White House adviser for Bill Clinton who is now raising money to build a grassroots movement to fight public corruption. According to Curry, Warren is right to make this the focus of any potential presidential campaign. 

“Corruption is the biggest problem we face because it’s the problem that keeps all the other problems from being solved,” he said. “This is the closest this country has to a consensus on any issue.”

A recent survey by the Kaiser Family Foundation bears that out: It found that corruption in Washington is the issue voters are most concerned about — more than health care, more than the economy and jobs. Bernie Sanders came close to winning the Democratic presidential nomination talking about this issue. And Donald Trump tapped into it when he promised “to drain the swamp.”

Peter Ubertaccio, a political scientist and dean of arts and sciences at Stonehill College, says Warren’s anti-corruption initiative is a smart way to reach voters disillusioned with Washington. But Ubertacio says that in other ways, Warren is not an ideal presidential candidate.

“She is going to bring some negatives to the table,” said Ubertaccio, who points out that Warren is not hugely popular nationally. “She will be characterized as an elite, out-of-touch liberal professor,” all of which could undermine her populist message.

Geoff Diehl, the Republican state representative who is running against Warren, has been arguing for months that she is more interested in the White House than Massachusetts. He says her announcement in Holyoke only proves his point.   

“I think Massachusetts deserves a full-time senator, not a part-time author, part-time senator and part-time presidential candidate,” Diehl told WBUR. “If she really cares about the White House, she should make that a full-time effort and drop out of this Senate race.”

That’s not likely. Warren is expected to easily beat Diehl. A recent WBUR poll showed Warren leading her Republican challenger by 26 points. Independent Shiva Ayyadurai trailed 25 points behind Diehl.

But a recent Suffolk University/Boston Globe poll found that 58 percent of Massachusetts voters say she should not run for president. Warren may be popular enough to win a second term in the Senate, but voters also recognize that running for president would be a lot more complicated.

Copyright 2018 WBUR

Anthony Brooks has more than twenty five years of experience in public radio, working as a producer, editor, reporter, and most recently, as a fill-in host for NPR. For years, Brooks has worked as a Boston-based reporter for NPR, covering regional issues across New England, including politics, criminal justice, and urban affairs. He has also covered higher education for NPR, and during the 2000 presidential election he was one of NPR's lead political reporters, covering the campaign from the early primaries through the Supreme Court's Bush V. Gore ruling. His reports have been heard for many years on NPR's Morning Edition, All Things Considered, and Weekend Edition.
Related Content