With MGM in talks to buy a casino in eastern Massachusetts and leave Springfield, local and state leaders insist they will have a significant say in how and whether that happens.
Wynn Resorts and MGM announced last week they are in preliminary conversations around the sale of the Wynn casino in Everett, which is slated to open in early summer.
If MGM bought it, the company would be legally required to sell its Springfield casino, since the state's casino law allows only one license per company.
Springfield Mayor Domenic Sarno said Tuesday he considers the potential sale mere "conjecture," pointing out that both Springfield officials and the Massachusetts Gaming Commission would have to approve a license transfer.
City Councilor Mike Fenton, who chairs the casino oversight committee, noted that MGM has reportedly been in similar talks several times before.
"I don't have any reason to believe that these discussions are any different from those prior ones," Fenton said Friday. "And until such time as they manifest themselves as different, we're going to continue trying to support the project that's already been a pretty successful project here for us in Springfield."
But if MGM does try to buy the Everett casino and sell its Springfield property, Fenton said he'd have serious concerns.
"One of the evaluating criteria that resulted in us selecting MGM was the reputation of their brand. And to the extent that that brand -- through future transactions -- would consider leaving the city, that would significantly alter the terms upon which we structured that deal," Fenton said. "Actually -- it would strike to the very core of that deal."
Disclosure: MGM has purchased underwriting from New England Public Radio publicizing the company's non-gambling activities. The NEPR newsroom operates independently of the station's development department, and editorial decisions are made without regard to any funding relationships.